How do you write maintainable and readable code?
This question evaluates how well you understand code quality, long-term collaboration, and good habits such as naming, documentation, and modularization.
In global teams — especially those with active code review processes — it’s important to show that you care about writing code that is clear, consistent, and easy for others to work with.
Answer 1: Practical habits and consistency
English
To write maintainable
and readable
code, I follow a few core practices. First, I use clear and consistent naming
for variables, functions, and files. Good naming can often reduce the need for extra comments.
Second, I break down logic into single-purpose functions
, which makes code easier to understand, test, and refactor. I also add comments when the purpose isn’t obvious from the code itself — but I avoid overcommenting.
Finally, I follow the team’s coding conventions
and use tools like linters and formatters to ensure consistency
. In my experience, consistency is more valuable than cleverness when it comes to long-term maintainability.
Key Expressions
- maintainable code: code that is easy to modify, debug, and extend over time
- readable code: code that is easy for others to understand at a glance
- clear and consistent naming: using meaningful names and applying the same style across the project
- single-purpose functions: functions that do one specific task to keep logic simple and reusable
- coding conventions: shared guidelines or rules for how code should be written and organized
- consistency: using the same patterns and styles across your codebase
Answer 2: Empathy and team-oriented mindset
English
For me, writing maintainable and readable code means writing for the next person who will read or update it — whether that’s a teammate or my future self. I try to write code with empathy for other developers
.
That means using descriptive variable names
, avoiding overly clever shortcuts
, and organizing the project structure
so that files and logic are easy to locate. When the business logic isn’t obvious, I include short comments to explain the reasoning behind decisions.
I also treat code reviews as a way to improve. I listen to feedback and believe that clean code
comes from continuous improvement
, not a one-time effort.
Key Expressions
- write code with empathy: write in a way that is considerate of others who will work with the code
- descriptive variable names: variable names that clearly show what the variable is for
- overly clever shortcuts: tricky code that’s hard to understand or maintain
- project structure: how folders and files are organized in a project
- continuous improvement: the habit of regularly improving your code and practices over time
Want to learn more?
Join CodeFriends Plus membership or enroll in a course to start your journey.